How to build AI agents with Redis memory management

Memory can be one of the trickier parts of building AI agents. Large language models (LLMs) are stateless at their core—the model itself doesn't retain information between API calls. Products like ChatGPT and Claude layer memory systems on top, which is why they remember your name and preferences. But when you're building your own agents, you need to implement that memory layer yourself.

Building memory that spans conversations, learns preferences over time, and retrieves relevant context when needed requires deliberate architectural decisions. The challenge is that agent memory isn't one thing. Most production agents need short-term context for coherent conversations, long-term storage for learned preferences, and semantic retrieval for surfacing relevant memories. All of this must be fast enough that users don't notice the overhead. Most teams underestimate this until they're deep into development.

This guide covers how to build AI agents with robust memory architectures. Rather than stitching together separate vector databases, caching layers, and session stores, you can unify these patterns on a single platform. Agent memory spans multiple storage patterns simultaneously, and managing these across separate systems introduces additional latency and operational complexity.

Why does memory matter?

AI agent memory is crucial for enhancing efficiency and capabilities because Large Language Models (LLMs) do not inherently remember things i.e., they are stateless. Memory allows AI agents to learn from past interactions, retain information, and maintain context, leading to more coherent and personalized responses.

Imagine an AI agent designed to plan and book work trips. Without memory, it won't remember personal preferences (e.g., "Do you like direct flights or flights with layovers?"); make procedural mistakes due to lack of understanding (e.g., booking a hotel that does not offer the amenities required for business trips, like meeting rooms or reliable Wi-Fi); and fail to recall previously provided details like passport information. This leads to a frustrating user experience with repetitive questions, inconsistent behaviour, and a lack of personalisation.

The impact shows up immediately in production. Relevance AI reduced vector search latency from 2 seconds to 10 milliseconds after migrating their vector search and caching to Redis—a 99.5% improvement in their environment.

Short-term & long-term memory

Building AI agents requires implementing multiple memory types that work together. Short-term memory handles immediate conversational context, serving as working memory that maintains coherence within a single interaction. Long-term memory persists across conversations, allowing agents to learn from feedback and adapt to user preferences over time.

Short-term memory

Short-term memory functions like RAM, holding relevant details for ongoing tasks but existing only briefly within a conversation thread. It faces two constraints: LLM context windows limit how much information can be actively maintained, and irrelevant information can pollute the context and degrade agent reasoning quality.

Managing short-term memory effectively requires frameworks that provide structured state management. LangGraph addresses this through Checkpointers, which are tools that maintain thread-specific context and enable agents to store conversational state in high-performance databases. Redis can store agent state with <1ms read/write latency in many workloads, helping agents retrieve conversational context quickly so users often experience no noticeable delay. This matters because agents make multiple context retrievals during complex reasoning loops, and latency compounds across these operations.

Long-term memory

Long-term memory functions more like a hard drive, storing information that can be accessed later when contextually relevant. It divides into three distinct types, each serving different agent capabilities (for more on these distinctions, see the CoALA framework paper):

• Episodic memory stores specific past events and experiences, creating a personal history of interactions. A travel agent might remember that a user previously booked a trip to London for a conference and prefers city-center hotels.
• Procedural memory stores learned skills and operational knowledge, forming the agent's repertoire of effective actions. An agent could learn the optimal process for booking flights, like ensuring appropriate layover times or avoiding specific airports based on past connection failures.
• Semantic memory stores general knowledge, facts, and relationships the agent draws on—often backed by a knowledge base (such as visa rules, policies, or FAQs) retrieved when contextually relevant.

Together, these memory types enable personalized recommendations grounded in past behavior, improved execution strategies through experience, and domain-specific reasoning retrieved when contextually relevant.

The complexity most teams underestimate

Managing these memory types introduces challenges that surface during development, not planning. You need to decide which memory types your app actually requires, determine what information deserves persistence versus what can be discarded, implement decay strategies so older irrelevant memories don't pollute retrieval, and design retrieval mechanisms that surface the right memories for current contexts. These decisions shape both agent effectiveness and infrastructure costs.

Key architectural decisions for agent memory

Four decisions shape your memory architecture: what to store, how to store it, how to retrieve it, and when to forget it.

Choosing memory types

Not every agent needs all memory types. A customer support agent needs episodic memory for interaction history across tickets. A product recommendation agent needs semantic memory for product specs and relationships. A coding assistant needs procedural memory for learned debugging strategies. Match your architecture to your use case rather than adding complexity for theoretical requirements.

Storing & updating memories

Context pollution, where irrelevant information degrades reasoning quality, means you need strategies to compress and organize memories. Three approaches commonly work well in production:

• Summarization condenses conversations using an LLM to extract key points. The memory module incrementally updates summaries as new data arrives, storing them as strings in Redis for retrieval during future queries. The Redis Agent Memory Server demonstrates this pattern. The tradeoff: you risk losing details that seem irrelevant now but matter later.
• Vectorization converts memories into vector embeddings for semantic search based on conceptual similarity rather than keywords. Segment memories into discrete chunks. Semantic chunking that preserves natural boundaries often works better than fixed-length splits. Then use vector search to retrieve relevant memories.
• Extraction pulls key facts, entities, and preferences into structured formats. A document store like RedisJSON stores these extracted facts with context, producing compact representations that support exact matching and range queries. The LangChain team's memory agent example demonstrates this approach.

Most production agents combine multiple techniques based on memory type and retrieval patterns.

Retrieving memories

Many production systems use hybrid retrieval: structured lookups first (exact match on user IDs, preferences, timestamps) with vector search as a second pass for semantic relevance. Vector search provides the semantic foundation—embed the current context, then search for stored embeddings with high similarity. More sophisticated approaches like MemGPT implement hierarchical systems where agents explicitly decide when to pull from long-term memory, generating queries via function calls. For most apps, start with vector search and add complexity only when retrieval quality becomes a bottleneck.

Managing memory decay

Without decay mechanisms, memory systems can grow unbounded and retrieval quality tends to degrade as irrelevant memories pollute results. Two practical approaches: add timestamps as metadata and weight recent memories higher during retrieval, or use Redis' built-in eviction and expiration policies to automatically remove old data. You can combine both by expiring stale memories automatically while using recency scoring for memories that persist.

Why Redis is a strong choice for agent memory

Redis is a strong fit for agent memory because it combines the storage patterns agents need in one platform:

• Fast performance: Reading and writing memories is on the "hot-path" of your application flow. Slow retrieval times can significantly impact user experience or force developers to make trade-offs against optimal performance. The in-memory architecture of Redis delivers sub-millisecond latency for many workloads, which matters for latency-sensitive agent applications.
• Fast and fully featured vector search: Redis provides native vector indexing and search capabilities for vector database workloads. Redis' published benchmarks report higher throughput at recall ≥0.98 than the other vector databases included in those tests. Given the need to vectorize and do semantic search on memories, vector performance matters when selecting your data platform.
• Integrated with your AI stack: Redis has supported integrations across popular AI frameworks, including LangGraph persistence, LlamaIndex vector store support, and a Redis-backed cache in AutoGen. In addition, developers can use RedisVL, a dedicated Python client library for using Redis in GenAI applications. RedisVL comes with built-in abstractions, including those for managing conversational memory.
• Scalability: When building agentic systems, predicting the storage requirements for AI agent memories, the number of clients needing access, and the frequency of data retrieval can be challenging. Redis offers features such as clustering, high availability, and persistence options that facilitate large-scale deployment. Redis Flex supports tiered storage across RAM and SSD to reduce costs for less frequently accessed data. Plus, Redis' built-in eviction and expiration policies simplify memory decay, ensuring efficient handling of data over time.
• Flexibility: Redis offers several data structure options out of the box. Data structures like hash (for streamlined efficiency) or JSON (for nested documents) give developers the flexibility to implement memory management however they prefer.

We make managing memory simpler with our open source Redis Agent Memory Server.

Example of agent memory using LangGraph & Redis

Here's how these patterns come together in practice using LangGraph and Redis.

Short-term memory with checkpointing

LangGraph's checkpointing system maintains thread-specific state across agent reasoning loops. When an agent receives a message, performs reasoning, calls tools, and generates responses, the checkpointer persists state at each step. This enables graceful error recovery, allowing agents to resume from the last successful checkpoint rather than restarting. It also lets users pause and resume conversations without losing context.

The LangGraph Redis checkpointer provides RedisSaver to store checkpoints with automatic serialization. Each checkpoint includes conversation history, tool results, and intermediate reasoning artifacts. When users send new messages, the agent loads the latest checkpoint and continues from that point.

Long-term memory with vector search

Long-term memory persists across conversation boundaries and needs semantic retrieval rather than sequential access. RedisVL provides high-level abstractions for storing memories as vector embeddings. You break memories into semantic chunks, generate embeddings with your chosen model, then store vectors with metadata like timestamps and user IDs that enable hybrid search combining similarity with exact filtering.

Retrieval embeds the current conversation context and searches for semantically similar stored memories. A user asking "Where did we decide to go last month?" retrieves memories based on meaning and temporal relevance rather than requiring exact keyword matches.

Memory consolidation

Raw conversation transcripts can grow unbounded without active management. Consolidation strategies periodically extract salient information, merge redundant entries, and discard irrelevant details. Common approaches include using LLMs to summarize conversation clusters, or extracting factual claims into structured data separate from episodic memories.

Manual vs. tool-based memory access

Manual management means your application code controls when to retrieve and store memories. This gives you tight control but requires explicit logic for each interaction. Tool-based access exposes memory operations as tools the agent can call autonomously, increasing flexibility at the cost of occasional suboptimal patterns.

Production implementations typically combine both: critical operations like checkpoint storage happen automatically, while optional operations like searching past conversations become tools the agent invokes when appropriate.

Reference implementation

The Redis Agent Memory Server demonstrates these patterns as an open-source reference. It integrates with LangGraph to manage conversational context via checkpointing and provides semantic memory retrieval through vector search. Deploy it as a standalone service or adapt the patterns for your own infrastructure.

Starting your AI agent development journey

Building your first agent with proper memory management starts with the LangGraph framework, which provides structured patterns for stateful agent workflows. Start with basic checkpointing that maintains conversation history within single threads, then add long-term memory by storing conversation summaries as vector embeddings. Advanced implementations layer in procedural memory for learned operational strategies and semantic memory for domain knowledge bases.

The Redis ecosystem provides resources to accelerate development. The Redis Agent Memory Server offers ready-to-deploy memory management. Redis AI resources include code samples and Jupyter notebooks for common agent scenarios. The Redis AI documentation covers vector search, semantic caching, and framework integrations.

Redis delivers a unified infrastructure that helps make agent memory architectures practical at scale: vector search, in-memory storage, flexible data structures, and built-in eviction policies in one platform.

Try Redis Cloud free to deploy managed Redis with automatic scaling and monitoring, or talk to Redis experts for architectural guidance on production agent memory systems.

FAQs

Why does memory management matter for AI agents?

Memory management enables AI agents to function beyond stateless operations. Without memory, agents can't retain context or learn from past interactions, limiting their ability to offer personalized experiences. Effective memory management allows agents to store and retrieve relevant information, delivering responses grounded in historical data and user preferences. This transforms them from basic question-answering systems into adaptive assistants capable of improving through repeated interactions.

How does Redis enhance AI agent memory capabilities?

Redis provides a unified real-time data platform that integrates vector search, in-memory storage, and flexible data structures for memory management. This integration reduces latency and complexity compared to systems requiring separate tools for each memory function. Redis is designed to deliver sub-millisecond read and write performance for many workloads, enabling fast retrieval during complex decision-making. Its native support for vector embeddings simplifies semantic search, allowing accurate retrieval of relevant memories without extensive custom configuration.

What's the difference between short-term and long-term memory in AI agents?

Short-term memory manages immediate conversational context, storing relevant details during ongoing interactions to maintain coherence within a single conversation. Long-term memory provides persistence across multiple sessions, allowing agents to learn and adapt over time. With Redis, short-term memory typically uses in-memory storage with sub-millisecond latency for quick retrieval. Long-term memory leverages Redis' vector search capabilities, breaking information into semantic vectors for retrieval through conceptual similarity rather than exact keywords.

How do vector embeddings enable semantic search in agent memory?

Vector embeddings transform data like text into numerical vectors representing semantic meaning. In AI agent memory management, embeddings enable retrieval based on conceptual similarity rather than exact keyword matching. When an agent receives a query, it generates an embedding and compares it with stored embeddings using similarity measures like cosine similarity. A query about "traveling to Paris" might retrieve memories about "visiting France" based on embedded semantic relationships, ensuring contextually appropriate responses.

What architectural decisions should I consider when building AI agents with Redis?

First, determine the memory types your app requires: short-term for conversational context or long-term forms like episodic, procedural, and semantic memory. Design strategies for summarizing and vectorizing interactions to avoid data bloat and ensure rapid retrieval. Choose effective memory retrieval methods, leveraging vector search for semantic similarity or hierarchical retrieval systems. Consider memory decay management using Redis' eviction policies. Finally, balance manual memory management with tools like Redis Agent Memory Server for flexibility and control