LMOVE source destination LEFT|RIGHT LEFT|RIGHT

Atomically returns and removes the first/last element (head/tail depending on the wherefrom argument) of the list stored at source, and pushes the element at the first/last element (head/tail depending on the whereto argument) of the list stored at destination.

For example: consider source holding the list a,b,c, and destination holding the list x,y,z. Executing LMOVE source destination RIGHT LEFT results in source holding a,b and destination holding c,x,y,z.

If source does not exist, the value nil is returned and no operation is performed. If source and destination are the same, the operation is equivalent to removing the first/last element from the list and pushing it as first/last element of the list, so it can be considered as a list rotation command (or a no-op if wherefrom is the same as whereto).

This command comes in place of the now deprecated RPOPLPUSH. Doing LMOVE RIGHT LEFT is equivalent.

*Return value

Bulk string reply: the element being popped and pushed.

*Examples

redis>  RPUSH mylist "one"
(integer) 1
redis>  RPUSH mylist "two"
(integer) 2
redis>  RPUSH mylist "three"
(integer) 3
redis>  LMOVE mylist myotherlist RIGHT LEFT
ERR Unknown or disabled command 'LMOVE'
redis>  LMOVE mylist myotherlist LEFT RIGHT
ERR Unknown or disabled command 'LMOVE'
redis>  LRANGE mylist 0 -1
1) "one"
2) "two"
3) "three"
redis>  LRANGE myotherlist 0 -1
(empty list or set)
redis> 

*Pattern: Reliable queue

Redis is often used as a messaging server to implement processing of background jobs or other kinds of messaging tasks. A simple form of queue is often obtained pushing values into a list in the producer side, and waiting for this values in the consumer side using RPOP (using polling), or BRPOP if the client is better served by a blocking operation.

However in this context the obtained queue is not reliable as messages can be lost, for example in the case there is a network problem or if the consumer crashes just after the message is received but it is still to process.

LMOVE (or BLMOVE for the blocking variant) offers a way to avoid this problem: the consumer fetches the message and at the same time pushes it into a processing list. It will use the LREM command in order to remove the message from the processing list once the message has been processed.

An additional client may monitor the processing list for items that remain there for too much time, and will push those timed out items into the queue again if needed.

*Pattern: Circular list

Using LMOVE with the same source and destination key, a client can visit all the elements of an N-elements list, one after the other, in O(N) without transferring the full list from the server to the client using a single LRANGE operation.

The above pattern works even if the following two conditions:

  • There are multiple clients rotating the list: they'll fetch different elements, until all the elements of the list are visited, and the process restarts.
  • Even if other clients are actively pushing new items at the end of the list.

The above makes it very simple to implement a system where a set of items must be processed by N workers continuously as fast as possible. An example is a monitoring system that must check that a set of web sites are reachable, with the smallest delay possible, using a number of parallel workers.

Note that this implementation of workers is trivially scalable and reliable, because even if a message is lost the item is still in the queue and will be processed at the next iteration.